| [ Top ] | Contents Page |
|
The Idiots' Guide to Highways
Maintenance |
BITS AND PIECES ABOUT ROAD PAVEMENT AND ROAD SURFACE FAILURE
CONTENTS
HIGHWAY FAILURE
FAILURE OF THE ROAD
PAVEMENT - DEFLECTOGRAPH
INVESTIGATING ROAD
PAVEMENT FAILURE - DTP ADVICE NOTE HA 30/85
PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL
FAILURE
DETERMINING CAUSE
OF ROAD PAVEMENT FAILURE - TRIAL HOLE - SITE INVESTIGATION
TRRL SUPPLEMENTARY
REPORT 550 : ROAD FAILURE WARNING LEVELS - STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE
TRL PROJECT REPORT
30 - VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITS - ROAD PAVEMENT WEAR / FAILURE
FAILURE OF A ROAD
PAVEMENT DESIGN - DRAINAGE - CBR
ROAD PAVEMENT
FAILURE - WHEEL TRACK RUTTING - WHEEL TRACKING - BASECOURSE
DENSIFICATION
ROAD PAVEMENT
FAILURE - WATER DAMAGE - POOR DRAINAGE
PREMATURE FAILURE
OF A ROAD
ROAD SURFACE
FAILURE
ROAD SURFACE
FAILURE - FRETTING - FRETTING OUT OF ROAD SURFACE
SURFACE COURSE (WEARING COURSE)
FAILURE
RESTORING ROAD
SURFACE SKID RESISTANCE FAILURE BY RETEXTURING
HOT ROLLED ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE
(WEARING COURSE) FAILURE - PRECOAT LOSS
FAILURE OF PRECOAT
ADHESION - PRECOAT LOSS - HOT SAND TEST - HRA SURFACE COURSE (WEARING COURSE)
HOT ROLLED ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE
(WEARING COURSE FAILURE) - WET SAND - RIDE QUALITY FAILURE -
PRECOAT LOSS
IRONWORK FAILURE,
AND HOW TO AVOID IT
FOOTWAY FAILURE -
TRL PROJECT REPORT PR/H/88/94 - FOOTWAY DESIGN
WHY DID IT FAIL ? -
WORKMANSHIP
WHY DID IT FAIL ? -
BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
WHY DID IT FAIL ? -
SURFACE DRESSING FAILURE
HIGHWAY FAILURE
There is not just one type of road failure, and there is not just
one reason for each type of failure, and it is in these
situations where it is very difficult to replace an experienced
engineer/technician with a guide such as this, but an attempt is
made to give guidance and supply some information.
The information is in small paragraphs because it is drawn
together on this page from other sources, and at the moment I do
not have the time to present it in a different manner.
So, work through the items provided, or use the "Find"
function of your web browser to search for specific items.
FAILURE OF THE ROAD
PAVEMENT - DEFLECTOGRAPH
DEFLECTOGRAPH usually refers to the machine i.e. the vehicle with
the specific deflectograph apparatus built into it.
The DEFLECTOGRAPH MACHINE is used to carry out a DEFLECTOGRAPH
SURVEY.
The Deflectograph Survey measures the amount a road pavement will
deflect when subjected to a standard load, the load being
supplied by the rear wheels ofthe vehicle being correctly
weighted.
Pivoted measuring arms pass between the pairs of rear wheels and
measure the deflection of the road, in one hundredths of a
millimetre, when the wheel load is applied.
Basically the more a road deflects the weaker it is BUT other
factors have to be applied to the deflection results before
assessing the road strength, e.g. the temperature at which the
survey took place and the nature of the construction of the road
pavement.
The process has been developed by the T.R.R.L. ( now the T.R.L. )
and is fully covered in TRRL REPORTS 833, 834 and 835.
The surveys are carried out to determine weak areas of highway
prior to actual failure and determine road strengthening measures
to prevent failure.
INVESTIGATING ROAD
PAVEMENT FAILURE - DTP ADVICE NOTE HA 30/85
The title of this Advice Note is :-
DTP
Advice Note HA 30/85 : Structural examination of bituminous
pavements.
Although this may still be quoted it has been SUPERSEDED by DTP DESIGN MANUAL
HD 29/94, and DTP DESIGN MANUAL HD 30/94.
This Advice Note gives recommendations for the structural
examination of bituminous pavements to identify the causes of
deterioration and failure.
PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL
FAILURE
This is when the PAVEMENT has failed, maybe not completely, but
in a major way.
The PAVEMENT is no longer able to absorb and transmit the wheel
loading through the fabric of the road without causing fairly
rapid further deterioration of the road pavement.
The layers making up the PAVEMENT have failed for various
reasons, E.g. through age, inadequate design, or an altering in
requirements of the strength of the PAVEMENT by increased traffic
flow/weight, impeded drainage decreasing subgrade strength, etc..
When you have STRUCTURAL FAILURE the solution is always a form of
RECONSTRUCTION.
I say a form of RECONSTRUCTION because it is not always necessary
or even advisable to remove material that is still sound and will
provide a good base to new work.
If total RECONSTRUCTION is needed so be it, but you really need
the experts in here to advise,
I mean real experts with a few years of real experience not just
somebody with a fancy machine, however much data they can
provide.
SEEK GOOD ADVICE !
DETERMINING CAUSE
OF ROAD PAVEMENT FAILURE - TRIAL HOLE - SITE INVESTIGATION
If you do not know what is in the existing road pavement, dig a
hole and have a look, providing you know what you are looking at,
and if you do not, get a man who does!
Even something as simple as the degree of difficulty in digging
the hole will give an indication of the strength of the materials
that make up its construction.
There is very little substitute for experience in trial hole
assessment but some things are common sense:-
1) How thick is the construction, how thick are the various
layers.
2 ) What type of material is it? bituminous, concrete, granular,
what condition is it in.
3) What is the height of the water table.
4) What is the type of subgrade, what is the CBR of the subgrade.
5) Is the road pavement material excavated in sound condition or
stripping and loose.
ALL THESE QUESTIONS AND MORE NEED ANSWERING TO ARRIVE AT THE NEW
ROAD DESIGN.
Trial holes are not expensive and can save you a lot of money, an
intimate REAL knowledge of the road you propose to
design/strengthen is NEVER wasted.
TRRL SUPPLEMENTARY
REPORT 550 : ROAD FAILURE WARNING LEVELS - STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE
The full title is :-
TRRL
Supplementary Report 550 : Proposed warning levels for the
structural maintenance of flexible roads
The report details various warning levels recommended for use in
highway maintenance rating systems.
TRL PROJECT REPORT
30 - VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITS - ROAD PAVEMENT WEAR / FAILURE
This report was produced as a result of a questionaire survey of
goods vehicle operators conducted by TRL.
The survey data was processed in such a manner as to give
estimates of numbers of goods vehicles, amounts of goods vehicle
travel, perhaps most importantly an indication of increased road
wear attributable to the increased weight limits.
FAILURE OF A ROAD
PAVEMENT DESIGN - DRAINAGE - CBR
DRAINAGE is VERY! VERY! VERY! IMPORTANT.
You MUST keep the water-table low to prevent the moisture content
of the SUBGRADE increasing, and hence decreasing the CBR VALUE on
which the ROAD PAVEMENT was designed.
If this is not done by the use of FRENCH DRAINS, or even open
ditches the road will weaken and fail.
The water-table of naturally occurring ground will rise and fall
from winter to summer, bear this in mind when designing the road,
and design for the highest water table conditions.
Also the ROAD PAVEMENT itself must be constructed so that it will
drain in the event of a failure of the integrity of the surfacing
layers.
The internal drainage function of a ROAD PAVEMENT is usually
performed by the GSB layer, this itself MUST be drained.
Water below the ROAD PAVEMENT must be kept low and not be allowed
to rise up into the construction layers, (and water CAN flow
upwards, by capillary action).
Water that enters the ROAD PAVEMENT from the surface MUST have a
drainage path out.
ROAD PAVEMENT
FAILURE - WHEEL TRACK RUTTING - WHEEL TRACKING - BASECOURSE
DENSIFICATION
WHEEL TRACK RUTTING is where, during hot weather, the surface course (wearing
course) bituminous mixture in the vehicle wheel tracks softens and is displaced /
pushed to each side of the actual track of the vehicle wheel when
meeting resistance from the stable binder course (basecourse) material beneath
the surface course (wearing course), with rutting you actually have a depression
in the wheel track and a hump each side.
It is possible to have only WHEEL TRACKING, with no associated
rutting, i.e. the twin humps.
This is where compaction in the wearing course and underlying binder course (basecourse) and even
base (roadbase) has been inadequate.
So, during hot weather and the weight of traffic the various
bituminous layers will compact causing a depression in the
wearing course, often referred to as DENSIFICATION.
The most appropriate way to study the nature of the deformation
is to actually "saw" transverse cross sections of the
failed pavement for visual study.
ROAD PAVEMENT
FAILURE - WATER DAMAGE - POOR DRAINAGE
Once water has entered a road pavement, WATER DAMAGE is initially
caused by hydraulic pressure,
i.e. vehicles passing over the road pavement impart considerable
sudden pressure on the water, this pressure forces the water
further into the road fabric and breaks it up, this process can
be very rapid once it begins.
Water that has entered the road pavement and is subject to the
process of freezing and thawing during the winter also brings
about the swift failure of the road pavement.
Eventually the water will descend to the subgrade layer below the
road pavement and weaken this layer thus lowering the CBR of the
subgrade which the road pavement design was based upon, and deep
seated failure of the road will begin.
PREMATURE FAILURE
OF A ROAD
The term PREMATURE FAILURE means what it says.
That is, the material, what ever it is, hot rolled asphalt (HRA) surface course
(wearing course),
surface dressing or structural concrete etc. has failed before
its predicted design life has expired.
This should not happen, something was/is wrong.
It is necessary to determine whether the design, specification,
supplied materials or workmanship was inadequate.
Except in obvious cases of failure this can be difficult to
determine, especially as financial considerations often outweighs
revealing the true problem, and reputations can be at stake.
ROAD SURFACE
FAILURE
This term means what it says, only the surface of the road has failed, usually
the bituminous SURFACE COURSE (WEARING COURSE).
The ROAD PAVEMENT is still sound, the SURFACE COURSE (WEARING COURSE) is still
structurally entire, but the surface no longer performs the
function it was designed to do, or the surface is beginning to
oxidise and fret.
That can mean the SKID RESISTANCE is no longer adequate, or the
surface is not water tight.
If a surface impervious to water is what you require, (you do not
from all surface courses), a suitable SURFACE DRESSING will seal the surface and provide
good skid resistance as long as the traffic loading on the road
is not very severe.
Where a SURFACE COURSE (WEARING COURSE) is designed to be porous, e.g. FRICTION COURSE / POROUS ASPHALT
and you have actually designed for
the passage of water through the wearing course, you may wish to consider the
change in nature a surface dressing will bring to the road surface before taking
that course of highway maintenance.
The life of a SURFACE DRESSING on a VERY heavily trafficked road
can be relatively short.
Unfortunately ROAD SURFACE FAILURE is often due to poor SURFACE
DRESSING, i.e. FATTED surfaces, or lost chippings.
These can be rectified with remedial surface dressings performed
with more care, but very often fatted surfaces need to be
replaced with thin bitumen macadam wearing course, e.g 10mm CGM.
ROAD SURFACE
FAILURE - FRETTING - FRETTING OUT OF ROAD SURFACE
This term, or the term FRETTING OUT are the terms used to
describe a surface material that is beginning to lose its surface
gradually, usually due to age,
BUT it can happen when the BINDER has been overheated in mixing
thus prematurely ageing the binder.
This is not general failure or structural failure, but as I have
said surface failure.
As long as overheating of the BINDER is not the cause of the
failure, further life may be obtained from the surfacing material
by the application of a suitable SURFACE DRESSING.
This can delay for many years the need to OVERLAY or reconstruct
the road.
The SURFACE DRESSING will seal and hold the the FRETTING
surfacing material.
SURFACE COURSE (WEARING COURSE)
FAILURE
It is necessary to decide whether the wearing course material has
failed altogether, if so the material will need replacing.
If it is in a relatively sound condition an OVERLAY could be used
if surrounding surface "levels" permit the addition of
another road pavement layer, this process will increase the
strength to the road pavement.
On the other hand perhaps the situation is that the RUNNING
SURFACE is no longer satisfactory but the material itself is
still good.
The ANTI SKID properties of the surface may be restored with a
suitable SURFACE DRESSING, or even RETEXTURING.
Problems such as WHEEL TRACK RUTTING also have to be considered,
both the material and RUNNING SURFACE may be adequate but there
may be ruts of such depth as to be dangerous to vehicles passing
through them on overtaking movements.
This will mean replacement or OVERLAY with WEARING COURSE and on
occasions even the BASECOURSE as well.
RESTORING ROAD
SURFACE SKID RESISTANCE FAILURE BY RETEXTURING
These are physical processes that will restore a texture to sound
surfaces that have become smooth through wear.
One type of retexturing machine retextures by impacting the
aggregate in the road surface with numerous small hardened steel
hammers to roughen the aggregate surface
Another machine impacts the road surface with free moving discs
mounted on a revolving drum.
Although the texture can be improved with these processes it must
be remembered that the Polished Stone Value (PSV) of the aggregate will remain the same.
An improvement in SKID RESISTANCE VALUE of the road surface is
NOT to be confused with PSV value of the aggregate, the PSV of an
aggregate cannot be improved, it is what it is !
The improvement in the skid resistance of the road surface is caused by the
creation/breaking of the exposed aggregate surfaces and once again providing
"sharp" angular edges to the exposed aggregate, similar to the state
of newly crushed aggregate.
The duration of the improvement in skid resistance will depend upon the actual
quality / characteristics of the the aggregate being retextured, but with good
aggregate an improvement can be sustained for several years.
An improvement is also achieved by removing the bitumen/fines matrix between
larger aggregate particles and thus increasing the macrotexture of the road
surface.
There are various contractors in the country able to provide
machinery capable of this type of RETEXTURING process, both large
lorry mounted and small hand operated units.
HOT ROLLED ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE
(WEARING COURSE) FAILURE - PRECOAT LOSS
PRECOATS are lost in two ways.
1) They are lost into the hot rolled asphalt (HRA) mat at the time of application and
rolling,
2) They are lost from the mat due to poor bonding and embedment.
However there are a number of reasons for both these types of
chipping loss!
Reasons for PRECOATS lost into the mat:-
[1] Material too hot, if temperature is within specification
delay rolling.
[2] HRA mat too thick, regulate prior to wearing course to achieve correct nominal thickness.
[3] Unstable material, WET SAND (usually after heavy rain), or
bad mix proportions.
Reasons for PRECOATS lost FROM the mat:-
[1] Material too cold, PRECOAT binder coating is not melted to
create bonding, check ALL temperatures
[2] HRA mat too thin, check thickness.
[3] Over chipping, chips on chips, check rate of spread.
[4] Delay in first pass of roller.
[5] PRECOAT bitumen coating too thin OR burnt/carbonised so no
bonding of chips to asphalt.
FAILURE OF PRECOAT
ADHESION - PRECOAT LOSS - HOT SAND TEST - HRA SURFACE COURSE (WEARING COURSE)
The HOT SAND TEST is a simple little test for assessing the
quality of the bitumen coating on the chipping, i.e. the
"precoating".
It is fully specified in BS 598:Part 108.
Basically it consists of shaking a certain quantity of PRECOATS
in a given quantity of hot sand, (the temperature is specified).
It is necessary for the PRECOATS to retain a certain minimum
quantity of sand for them to meet the specification.
The test is to ensure the binder on the precoated chippings has
not been carbonised by overheating in the coating process.
It is necessary to have active binder coating the chippings to
ensure good retention of the PRECOATS by the HRA WEARING COURSE.
During laying, the HRA at the correct temperature will melt the
bitumen binder covering the PRECOAT and on cooling will bond the
chipping into and onto the HRA wearing course.
HOT ROLLED ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE
(WEARING COURSE FAILURE) - WET SAND - RIDE QUALITY FAILURE -
PRECOAT LOSS
This is a phenomena which DOES occur whatever suppliers claim.
It is a rare happening, but when it does happen it is usually
after a period of heavy or continuous rain that has saturated the
sand stockpiles.
The time for the sand spent in the drier will not have been
increased to remove the extra water,
OR production pressure does not allow for the increasing of
drying time.
The water is not of course water but steam trapped around the
sand particles, this produces instability in the asphalt.
It will show itself in the lorry body by being absolutely flat
with usually free (displaced) bitumen on the surface.
If stood on, (on top of the sheet), in extreme cases you will be
able to make the asphalt move like a liquid.
Because of its instable nature it is difficult to control the
"bed" of the Blaw Knox making it difficult to lay the
material to levels, also PRECOATS applied to the surface may disappear into it.
IRONWORK FAILURE,
AND HOW TO AVOID IT
The term IRONWORK used in relation to highways maintenance and
construction means gulleys (drains), manholes, stop-tap covers,
inspection chamber covers, etc. etc..
All these products will be manufactured to the appropriate
British Standard with regards to approved designs, dimensions and
strength.
To achieve maximum effectiveness and strength IRONWORK must be
lifted / installed / bedded in the correct way, poor workmanship
in installation is the biggest cause of IRONWORK failure.
IRONWORK that has been lifted poorly will "move" and
settle, making the road unsafe, and cause premature failure of
the pavement construction / surfacing / overlay, and even failure
of the manhole cover, gully. etc..
Obtain a copy of the IRONWORK LIFTING specification for full
details,
but basically the chamber shall be soundly constructed and
pointed (if brickwork), some chambers / gulley pots are pre-made
in concrete.
Or, preformed in plastic which is then completely surrounded with
fresh concrete for strength.
When/if the plastic "former" is not completely surrounded with
suitable concrete this is often the cause of structural failure of the gully,
sometimes within the first few years of construction.
The IRONWORK shall be bedded on an approved mortar, quite often a
rapid setting mortar,
e.g. a strength of 10n./mm.squared at 2 hours.
IRONWORK can be lifted before or after the wearing course has
been laid, but it is preferred to lift before final surfacing if
possible as this allows more thorough inspection of the IRONWORK
LIFTING, and it avoids extra joints in the surfacing and allows
better compaction of material.
FOOTWAY
FAILURE - TRL PROJECT REPORT PR/H/88/94 - FOOTWAY DESIGN
This report reviews the present methods for the design of
footways and the causes of deterioration.
It also considers new approaches to the design of footway
construction
WHY DID IT FAIL ? -
WORKMANSHIP
Before you start blaming materials as the cause of failure
because it may be "convenient" to both Contractor and
Engineer I suggest you look closely at the standard of
workmanship employed in laying / using the various construction materials.
(But do bear in mind that some materials, especially hot bituminous materials,
do need the right weather conditions to allow successful laying, however good
the possible workmanship may be.)
First determine whether the quality of workmanship available is
suitable for the nature of the work to be done.
Contrary to some opinion held by some management who believe road
maintenance and construction can be performed by any type of
workman, and achieve quality of work.
This is just NOT so, you need quality men and good quality plant
for quality work and enough of them / it for the job in hand.
And, If you send a good kerb-layer, (with no black-top
experience) to lay H.R.A. you have got problems!
Similarly, an experienced "black-top" operative is not
likely to be to good at laying kerbs, etc..
WHY DID IT FAIL ? -
BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
The following are a few possibilities:-
1] Did you order the correct material, and did you receive the
material you specified, did you check the delivery ticket.
2] Was the material too hot/cold, did you check the temperature.
3] Did the material visually appear to be of the correct
composition, did it look dry / rich, uncoated, coarse / fine,
segregated, make site notes, take sample for testing.
4] Was material stable in lorry body, i.e. still in noticeable
heaps, not flat and "fatty"
5] Was there segregation within the material, a problem with
larger aggregate, e.g. 32MM. BASE (ROADBASE), when the larger aggregate can roll to the
outside edges of the lorry body as the material is load, and the lower the
binder content of the mixture the more this is likely to happen.
So, take particular caution when using low binder content 32mm.
"design" base (roadbase) mixtures.
6] With material that is flat and fatty was there condensation on
underside of covering sheet, these conditions tend to indicate
moisture in still present in material due to incomplete drying,
and this will mean you have bituminous material with poor
stability.
This can be a problem in hot rolled asphalt after periods of
heavy rain when sand stockpiles at quarries have become
saturated.
The above points assume you have correctly specified the material
and the laying procedure has been correct and you still have a
failure.
N.B. If you have doubts about a material, record these doubts
even if there is no failure at that time, it may still happen!
WHY DID IT FAIL ? -
SURFACE DRESSING FAILURE
SURFACE DRESSING fails for many reasons and it MUST be said most
of the causes of failure can be controlled.
For those of you with little experience of SURFACE DRESSING I
would recommend you first read and digest Road Note 39, and TRRL
Report 627.
If you do not have immediate access to them read all items in
this database with SURFACE DRESSING included in their title.
BUT I will list a few factors for you to consider, BUT in some
cases (and ONLY some) the failure can be obvious:-
| "Fatting up" failure | "Chipping loss" failure |
[1] Road hardness assessed wrongly.
[2] Wrong size chipping used.
[3] Wrong rate of spread of BINDER chosen.
[4] Different rate of spread of BINDER sprayed to that chosen,
e.g.
a) Speedometer of sprayer inaccurate.
b) Incorrect "rate of spread speed chart" for a
particular sprayer.
c) Tank pressure incorrect.
d )BINDER VISCOSITY not that specified.
[5] Wrong BINDER VISCOSITY specified for ambient temperature.
[6] Badly formulated BINDER e.g. unsuitable BASE BINDER.
[7] Poor traffic control.
[8] Site not suitable for surface dressing, e.g. areas of
"screwing" traffic.
[9] Ambient temperature too cold.
[10] Dirty/dusty chippings.
ETC., ETC.