| [ Top ] | Hot rolled asphalt and precoated chippings |
|
The Idiots' Guide to Highways
Maintenance |
''Aspho-Chip' & 'Aspho-Chipless'
The two proven bituminous surfacing materials of the 70's, 80's
and 90's (and in some authorities the 21st. century).
'Aspho-Chip'
Comprising of a layer of durable and impervious bituminous
material with a surface applied layer of high PSV aggregate chippings, of 14mm
or 10mm size, coated with a layer of 50pen bitumen.
The bituminous material having 30/35% aggregate content of a
10mm. or 14mm. nominal size aggregate.
"Aspho-Chipless"
Comprising
of a layer of durable and impervious bituminous material
incorporating 55% aggregate of 10mm. or 14mm. nominal size with
an appropriate PSV for the site conditions.
PERSONAL NOTE
If you have not guessed already there are no such materials as
"Aspho-Chip" and Aspho-Chipless", well not just
yet, but give the marketing boys time, especially with the increased
complication of specifying the materials that you require to the BS EN 13108 family of standards for specifying
bituminous mixtures.
The above are the excellent reasons for, and the drawbacks
against using hot rolled asphalt wearing course and precoats, as formerly specified in,
BS 594 : 2005 : Hot rolled
asphalt for roads and other paved areas :
Part 1 : Specification for constituent materials and asphalt mixes
I am a great believer in this material for more reasons than I
care to bore you with, and I am not going to stop supporting it
because for some very strange reason it is no longer
"fashionable".
Although it is still far more used than the "engineering journals" and
public relation "boys and girls" would have you believe.
However you will now (from 1st. January 2008) need to refer to,
BS EN 13108 : Bituminous mixttures -
Material specifications - Part 4 : Hot Rolled Asphalt,
and,
BS EN 13108 : Bituminous mixtures -
Material specifications - Part 20 : Type testing
BS EN 13108 : Bituminous mixtures - Material specifications - Part 21 : Factory
Production Control
so that you may define the target specification of the bituminous mixture (hot
rolled asphalt) that you wish to be supplied with.
This specification (recipe) will take the form of a "CE" conformity
marking, an example of which can be found in,
BS EN 13108 : Bituminous mixttures -
Material specifications - Part 4 : Hot Rolled Asphalt, Appendix ZA.3 CE marking
and labelling.
It is entirely possible to specify, for
practical purposes, the same materials that it has always been possible to
purchase, you just need to put in a little more effort, initially, until you
have defined a number of specifications/recipes to cover the range of HRA's that
you wish to employ on your highway network.
I will bore you with just one justification for my support of HRA materials
equivalent to BS 594 specifications/recipes, that is BS 594 : Col. 6/4 : 30%/14mm. hot rolled
asphalt wearing course, has a binder content target of 7.8%.
Most
modern proprietary "Thin Surfacings" have binder
targets of between 5.0% and 5.5%, all these figures have binder
tolerances of at least plus or minus 0.5%.
It is important to note these figures are by mass not by volume ,
aggregate is approximately 2.7 times more dense than bitumen.
So a material with a binder content of 7.8% by mass has about a
20% binder content by volume, and in my experience durability of
bituminous material is dependent on an adequate bitumen content
of the appropriate grade and properties.
( Your friendly Materials Engineer will explain it to you in more
depth.)
The evidence for my support of this material is on roads all
around me, with many, many miles of this type of road surface
over twenty years old with no subsequent treatment, and some just
receiving a surface dressing.
If this surfacing process is good enough, and quiet enough, to
surface The Mall outside Buckingham Palace I am not too proud to
keep recommending it for general use, but without the red
chipping, (except in traffic calming areas).
At my last "London Marathon -
2007" inspection of the Mall as I watched the event
on television, the surface still looked excellent to me, as you do get a good
view of the surface when the camera angle follows the feet of the
"elite" runners.
Those of you that may be interested in looking at this excellent HRA surface,
the 2008 "camera survey" will be taking place very soon and
transmitted to your home.
Although I cannot exactly remember when it was laid, I think it is likely be at
least 15 years old, probably nearer to 20 years, and looks good for another 15
to 20 marathons, if it does not
experience too much "utility" work.
Even with utility work, providing you have a supply of the original chippings a
"match" with the original surface should not be difficult to achieve.